Individual Case Analysis 5: Isnt’ Fair Essay

1. Indicate bloody shames mental attitude before and after merging Sue. If there was a change, why? in the first place bloody shame met Sue, she held the high society in soaring esteem and was actually proud of operative for Universal Manufacturers. The companys establishmental culture was conducive for her, and staff back up her whenever she was in necessity of help. In add-on to this, her input to the company was being apprehended and she was given challenging assignments which presented practical go steady to her. Her manager, Tom had electropositive thoughts of her and she passed her annual review. Her requital was gaind by 10% from $40,000, whereas almost employees had an increase of 5%. However, after bloody shame met Sue, her attitude towards the company changed.Sue had joined the company a year after than Mary and yet her starting turn outment was $45,000, which was $5,000 more than the salary they had started Mary with. It is too $1000 more than Mary woul d take after her 10% increase, which is $44,000. This revealed a direct of contrariety and unfair treatment of employees since employees ought to be remunerated according to their input to the company. Mary had similar qualifications with Sue when she joined the organization and had put in hard work, which was acknowledge by every whiz in the company.However, the fact that one year after putting in these apparent movements, she would still bind lower pay than Sue, who had recently joined the organization do her have a negative attitude towards the company. Marys attitude towards the company changed and became negative due to this perception of discrimination and unfairness. The change in attitude ordain likely influence her ability to perform, and this may have a negative affect on the company. 2. What do you think Maty ordain do now? Later?I personally think that after Mary changes her attitude towards the company, her capital punishment will be affected. At present, sh e will not do anything which may put her in the spotlight, just she will be secretly looking at for opportunities in other companies. Her qualifications and experience limit her an asset to any company. According to the accommodate Barrons Educational Series, employers should pay employees high salaries if they perform well and lesser salaries if they atomic number 18 new to the job or have lower input to the organization.That is why I also think that Mary will put less effort in the company due to a descend in motif, but she would not loose immediately since she does not have an resource job which would pay her bills. However, in the farseeing she would resign after she successfully obtains craft in a company which determine her input and remunerates all employees according to their efforts.3. What motivation scheme applies best to this scenario? Explain. The motivation supposition that applies best to this case study is the prevision theory of motivation. This theo ry was advanced by Vroom, and it explains the process which employees undergo when making choices. The theory suggests that although individuals may have contrasting sets of goals, they net be motivated if they believe that there is a positive correlation amid efforts and effect, favorable performance will subject in a desirable wages, the reward will satisfy an important aim or/and the longing to satisfy the need is strong enough to make the effort worthwhile.The theory is based upon the following beliefs valenceValence refers to the emotional orientations people prevail with respect to outcomes rewards. The depth of the want of an employee for adventitious money, promotion, time-off, benefits or intrinsic satisfaction rewards). commission essential discover what employees value. ExpectancyEmployees have different conveyations and levels of confidence about what they are clear of doing. Management must discover what resources, training, or supervision employees need. InstrumentalityThe perception of employees as to whether they will actually get what they desire even if it has been promised by a manager. Management must ensure that promises of rewards are execute and that employees are aware of that. According to Schermerhorn, employees expect higher rewards due to better performance in organizations. On this theory, organizations should relate rewards to performance if employees are to be motivated. Initially, Mary had positive thoughts about the company due to the increase in salary after her steady-going performance. However, these thoughts became negative after realizing that Sue authorized a higher salary in spite of her low input to the organization, explaining her chemical reaction according to the expectancy theory of motivation. flora CitedMontana, Patrick J. & Charnov, Bruce H. Management 4th edition. New York Barrons Educational Series, 2008 p 35-43 Schermerhorn Jr. John, feed James & Osborn Richard. Organizational Behavior (12th Edition). Wiley Danvers, MA, 2007 p43-56http//www2.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/dstools/ figure of speech/vroom.html